H.R.76 - Fund and Complete the Border Wall Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.76, the "Fund and Complete the Border Wall Act," aims to establish a dedicated fund within the Treasury for securing the southern border. The bill mandates the construction and maintenance of a barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border, along with the procurement of equipment for Border Patrol agents. It also introduces financial penalties for countries whose citizens illegally cross the border and imposes a fee on remittance transfers sent outside the U.S., directing these funds to the border wall project.
Expected Effects
The bill's enactment would lead to increased border security measures, potentially reducing illegal immigration. It would also shift financial burdens onto foreign countries and individuals sending money abroad. The construction of the wall could face legal challenges and impact the environment and communities near the border.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced border security, potentially reducing illegal immigration and drug trafficking.
- Increased funding for Border Patrol agents and equipment.
- Financial penalties may incentivize foreign countries to cooperate on immigration control.
- Job creation in the construction and security sectors.
- Dedicated funding stream for border security measures.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased costs for remittance transfers, disproportionately affecting individuals sending money to family abroad.
- Possible negative impacts on international relations, particularly with Mexico and other Latin American countries.
- Environmental damage and disruption to local communities due to wall construction.
- Legal challenges related to land acquisition and environmental regulations.
- Potential for ineffective use of resources if the border wall proves to be an inefficient deterrent.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's focus on border security aligns with the federal government's responsibility for national defense and immigration control, as outlined in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. However, the potential impact on individual liberties and due process rights of immigrants, as well as the potential for environmental damage, could raise concerns under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The delegation of authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive legal requirements could also be challenged as an overreach of executive power.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).