H.R.792 - To direct the Secretary of the Interior to arrange for the carving of the figure of President Donald J. Trump on Mount Rushmore National Memorial. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.792 proposes directing the Secretary of the Interior to arrange for the carving of President Donald J. Trump's figure on Mount Rushmore National Memorial. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mrs. Luna on January 28, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
The bill's primary action is mandating the addition of President Trump's likeness to Mount Rushmore. This would be executed through the Director of the National Park Service.
The bill's passage and implementation would be a significant alteration to a national monument, potentially sparking considerable public debate and legal challenges.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R. 792 would result in the physical alteration of Mount Rushmore National Memorial. This change would be permanent and irreversible.
It would also likely lead to increased tourism and attention to the site, at least in the short term. However, it could also generate controversy and protests.
Furthermore, the bill could set a precedent for future additions to national monuments based on political considerations.
Potential Benefits
- Potential increase in tourism and revenue for the surrounding area.
- Symbolic recognition of President Trump's contributions, according to his supporters.
- Could foster a sense of national unity among certain segments of the population.
- May stimulate debate and discussion about presidential legacies and national monuments.
- Could create temporary employment opportunities related to the carving process.
Potential Disadvantages
- Significant environmental impact on a protected national monument.
- Potential desecration of a site considered sacred by Native American tribes.
- Risk of setting a politically motivated precedent for altering national monuments.
- Likely to generate considerable public controversy and division.
- Substantial financial cost associated with the carving project.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is questionable. While Congress has broad authority over federal lands and monuments, this action could be challenged under the First Amendment if it's argued that it promotes a specific political ideology or leader, thereby violating the Establishment Clause.
Additionally, the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause could be invoked by Native American tribes if they demonstrate a historical or cultural connection to Mount Rushmore and argue that the carving infringes upon their rights or heritage.
Article I, Section 8 grants Congress the power to control federal lands, but this power is not unlimited and must be balanced against other constitutional protections.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).