H.R.901 - Research Security and Accountability in DHS Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.901, the "Research Security and Accountability in DHS Act," mandates the Under Secretary of the Science and Technology Directorate of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to develop a Department-wide policy and process for safeguarding research and development from unauthorized access or disclosure of sensitive information. It also requires the Comptroller General to report on DHS's compliance with National Security Presidential Memorandum-33 (NSPM-33) and related implementation guidance.
The Act further directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide a briefing to relevant congressional committees on the development of these policies and processes. This aims to enhance the security of sensitive research within DHS and ensure compliance with national security directives.
Ultimately, the goal is to protect sensitive information, maintain national security, and ensure accountability in research and development activities within the Department of Homeland Security.
Expected Effects
The Act will likely lead to the establishment of stricter security protocols within the Department of Homeland Security concerning research and development activities. This includes enhanced measures to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information.
It will also result in increased oversight and reporting requirements, ensuring that DHS adheres to national security guidelines and policies. The GAO report and congressional briefing will provide avenues for accountability and transparency.
These changes will likely impact researchers, contractors, and other personnel involved in DHS-related research, potentially requiring them to undergo additional security clearances or training.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced protection of sensitive research and development information within DHS.
- Improved compliance with national security directives and guidelines.
- Increased accountability and transparency in DHS research activities through GAO reports and congressional briefings.
- Strengthened national security by preventing unauthorized access to critical research data.
- Promotes a more secure research environment, fostering greater trust and collaboration.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased bureaucracy and administrative burden on researchers and DHS personnel.
- Possible delays in research projects due to stricter security protocols and compliance requirements.
- Risk of hindering open scientific exchange and collaboration if security measures are overly restrictive.
- Costs associated with implementing new security policies and procedures.
- Potential for increased scrutiny and oversight, which could stifle innovation and creativity.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act aligns with the US Constitution by promoting national security, which is a legitimate government interest. While the Constitution does not explicitly address research security, Article I, Section 8, provides Congress with the power to provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States, which can be interpreted to include safeguarding sensitive research related to national security.
The Act does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or liberties. It does not violate the First Amendment, as it does not restrict freedom of speech or expression. It also does not violate the Fourth Amendment, as it does not authorize unreasonable searches or seizures.
However, the implementation of the Act should be carefully monitored to ensure that it does not unduly burden individual liberties or academic freedom. The balance between national security and individual rights must be maintained to ensure constitutional compliance.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).