H.R.93 - Stop Imposing Woke Ideology Abroad Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 93, the "Stop Imposing Woke Ideology Abroad Act," aims to prohibit federal funding for the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice within the Department of State and to prevent the implementation of the Department's Equity Action Plan. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Biggs of Arizona and referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. The bill seeks to restrict the use of federal funds in specific areas related to racial equity initiatives within the State Department.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the bill would eliminate funding for the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice, potentially leading to the abolishment of the position. It would also halt the implementation of the Department of State's Equity Action Plan. This could result in a shift in the Department's focus and resource allocation regarding racial equity and justice initiatives.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces government spending by eliminating funding for specific programs.
- May align with the views of those who believe such initiatives represent an overreach of government influence.
- Could lead to a refocusing of resources on other priorities within the Department of State.
- Might be seen as upholding principles of equal opportunity by preventing targeted equity initiatives.
- Could reduce perceived ideological bias in foreign policy.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could hinder efforts to address racial disparities and promote social equity in foreign policy.
- May negatively impact the United States' reputation and standing on human rights issues internationally.
- Could be seen as undermining the Department of State's ability to address systemic inequalities.
- Might alienate allies and partners who prioritize racial equity and social justice.
- Potentially limits the Department's ability to engage with diverse communities and address global challenges effectively.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex. Congress has the power of the purse (Article I, Section 9, Clause 7), granting it significant control over federal spending. However, the bill's potential impact on the Department of State's ability to conduct foreign policy could raise questions about the executive branch's authority in that domain. The bill does not appear to directly infringe upon any specific constitutional rights, such as those protected by the First Amendment.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).