H.R.es189 - Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.189 proposes censuring Representative Al Green of Texas for disrupting the President's address during a joint session of Congress. The resolution cites Mr. Green's interruptions and subsequent removal from the chamber as a breach of proper conduct. The resolution was submitted to the House Committee on Ethics for review.
Expected Effects
If passed, Representative Green would be formally censured, required to present himself in the House well for the pronouncement of censure, and the resolution would be read publicly by the Speaker. This action serves as a formal reprimand by the House of Representatives.
Potential Benefits
- Upholds decorum and order during official proceedings.
- Reinforces standards of conduct for members of Congress.
- May deter similar disruptions in the future.
- Demonstrates accountability for breaches of congressional protocol.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could be perceived as a politically motivated action.
- May further polarize the political climate.
- Could be seen as an infringement on freedom of speech, although within the context of disrupting official proceedings.
- May set a precedent for censuring members for expressing dissenting views.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution's constitutional alignment is complex. While Article I, Section 5 grants each House the power to determine the rules of its proceedings and to punish its members for disorderly behavior, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech. The key question is whether the Representative's actions were disruptive enough to warrant censure, or whether the censure itself unduly infringes upon his right to express his views.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).