H.R.es19 - Providing the sense of the House of Representatives that the House should not adjourn until the annual appropriation bills within the jurisdiction of all the subcommittees of the Committee on Appropriations for the current fiscal year are enacted into law. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.19 expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that it should not adjourn until all annual appropriation bills within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Appropriations' subcommittees for the current fiscal year are enacted into law. The resolution was introduced in the House on January 7, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Appropriations. It is sponsored by Mr. Ogles, Mr. Clyde, and Mrs. Luna.
The resolution aims to ensure that all necessary appropriation bills are passed before the House adjourns. This is intended to promote responsible governance and prevent potential disruptions in government funding.
The resolution itself does not enact any laws or allocate any funds; it simply states the House's intention.
Expected Effects
If adopted, H.Res.19 would commit the House to remain in session until all appropriation bills are enacted. This could lead to more thorough consideration of these bills and potentially reduce the likelihood of continuing resolutions or government shutdowns.
However, it could also lead to increased political pressure and longer work periods for members of the House.
The actual effect depends on the willingness of the House to adhere to this resolution and the political dynamics surrounding the appropriation process.
Potential Benefits
- Ensures all appropriation bills are addressed, potentially leading to more stable government funding.
- May encourage more thorough debate and consideration of appropriation measures.
- Could reduce the need for continuing resolutions, which can create uncertainty.
- Demonstrates a commitment to fulfilling budgetary responsibilities.
- Could improve public trust by showing the House is dedicated to its duties.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could lead to longer work periods and increased pressure on House members.
- May not be effective if the House is unwilling to adhere to the resolution.
- Could be used as a political tool to delay or obstruct other legislative priorities.
- Does not guarantee that the appropriation bills will be passed efficiently or effectively.
- The resolution itself has no legal authority; it is merely a statement of intent.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the general principles of Article I, Section 7 of the US Constitution, which outlines the legislative process for passing bills, including appropriation bills. It also aligns with the overall structure of the US government, where the House of Representatives plays a crucial role in the budget process.
However, the resolution itself does not directly implicate any specific constitutional provision. It is primarily a procedural matter within the House's internal operations.
The Constitution grants each chamber of Congress the power to determine the rules of its proceedings (Article I, Section 5), and this resolution falls within that purview.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).