H.R.es197 - Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.197 is a resolution to censure Representative Al Green of Texas for disrupting a joint session of Congress during President Trump's address. The resolution cites violations of decorum and order, referencing the Speaker's instructions and Representative Green's subsequent removal from the chamber. The resolution seeks to publicly censure Representative Green, requiring him to appear in the House for the pronouncement and reading of the censure.
Expected Effects
If passed, the resolution would result in a formal reprimand of Representative Green by the House of Representatives. This censure would be a public act, potentially damaging his reputation and standing within the House. The resolution's passage would also set a precedent for censuring members for similar behavior during congressional sessions.
Potential Benefits
- Could reinforce standards of decorum and respect during congressional proceedings.
- May deter similar disruptive behavior in the future.
- Could be seen as upholding the authority of the Speaker of the House to maintain order.
- Might reassure the public that Congress takes breaches of decorum seriously.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could be viewed as a politically motivated attack on a member of the opposing party.
- May stifle dissenting voices and limit freedom of expression within Congress.
- Could further polarize the political climate.
- Could set a precedent for censuring members for expressing dissenting opinions during presidential addresses.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution raises questions regarding the balance between maintaining order in Congress and protecting freedom of speech. While Article I, Section 5 grants each House the power to determine the rules of its proceedings and punish its members for disorderly behavior, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech. The key question is whether Representative Green's actions were so disruptive as to warrant censure, or whether the censure itself infringes upon his right to express his views.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).