H.R.es202 - Censuring Representative Lauren Boebert of Colorado for her recent disparaging and derogatory comments about Representative Al Green of Texas. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.202 proposes censuring Representative Lauren Boebert for disparaging remarks made about Representative Al Green. The resolution cites Boebert's comments during an interview as being "disparaging, derogatory, and racist." The resolution calls for her to be censured, present herself in the House well for pronouncement of censure, and for the resolution to be read publicly by the Speaker.
Expected Effects
If passed, the resolution would result in a formal reprimand of Representative Boebert by the House of Representatives. This censure would be a public condemnation of her behavior. It could also lead to further disciplinary actions by the House, although this is not explicitly stated in the resolution.
Potential Benefits
- Could promote a more respectful and civil discourse within the House of Representatives.
- May deter similar behavior from other members in the future.
- Could reinforce standards of conduct and decorum for elected officials.
- Sends a message that racist or derogatory language is unacceptable in Congress.
- Could improve the public's perception of Congress by demonstrating a commitment to ethical behavior.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could be seen as a partisan action, further dividing the House.
- May set a precedent for censuring members for speech, potentially chilling free expression.
- Could be perceived as focusing on speech rather than substantive policy issues.
- May further inflame political tensions and polarization.
- Could be viewed as a symbolic gesture with limited practical impact.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution raises questions related to the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech. While the Constitution protects speech, this protection is not absolute, especially within the context of Congress and its internal rules of conduct. The House has the power to set its own rules of procedure and discipline its members. Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 states that "Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member."
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).