H.R.es211 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 25) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to ‘‘Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales’’; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1156) to amend the CARES Act to extend the statute of limitations for fraud under certain unemployment programs, a…
Summary
H.Res. 211 is a resolution providing for the consideration of three bills in the House of Representatives. These bills address IRS regulations on digital asset sales, extend the statute of limitations for fraud under certain unemployment programs related to the CARES Act, and provide further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025.
The resolution waives points of order against the consideration of these bills and sets the terms for debate and amendments. It also addresses the National Emergencies Act, impacting the timeline for terminating a national emergency declared by the President.
Expected Effects
The resolution will expedite the consideration of the specified bills in the House by waiving certain procedural hurdles. This could lead to quicker decisions on matters related to digital asset regulation, unemployment fraud, and government funding. The change to the National Emergencies Act could also prolong the duration of a declared national emergency.
Potential Benefits
- Streamlined legislative process for key bills.
- Focused debate on important issues like digital assets and unemployment fraud.
- Potential for quicker resolution of budgetary matters.
- Could lead to more efficient governance by addressing procedural delays.
- Allows Congress to address pressing issues more rapidly.
Potential Disadvantages
- Waiving points of order could bypass important procedural safeguards.
- Limited debate time may not allow for thorough consideration of all aspects of the bills.
- Potential for rushed decisions without adequate scrutiny.
- Changes to the National Emergencies Act could extend executive power.
- May reduce opportunities for minority party input.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution itself is a procedural matter within the powers of the House of Representatives, as outlined in Article I, Section 5, which grants each house the power to determine the rules of its proceedings. Waiving points of order is a common practice, but it should be balanced with the need for due process and thorough consideration of legislation.
The resolution does not appear to directly infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations. However, the content of the underlying bills (H.J. Res. 25, H.R. 1156, and H.R. 1968) would need to be assessed separately for their constitutional alignment.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).