H.R.es238 - Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that every person has the basic right to emergency health care, including abortion care. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.238 is a resolution introduced in the House of Representatives expressing the sense of the House that every person has a basic right to emergency health care, including abortion care. The resolution highlights concerns about restrictions on reproductive health care and their potential risks to pregnant individuals. It emphasizes the importance of access to emergency care without discrimination.
Expected Effects
If passed, this resolution would formally state the House's position on emergency health care access. While it doesn't create new laws or mandates, it could influence future legislation and policy debates related to healthcare and reproductive rights. It also serves as a signal of support for accessible emergency abortion care.
Potential Benefits
- Reinforces the importance of emergency health care access for all individuals.
- Highlights potential risks associated with restricting reproductive health care.
- Supports the idea that medical professionals should prioritize patient health in emergency situations.
- Could lead to increased awareness and discussion about healthcare disparities.
- May influence future legislation aimed at protecting access to emergency medical services.
Potential Disadvantages
- The resolution is non-binding and may not result in concrete changes.
- It could deepen political divisions on the issue of abortion.
- Opponents may argue it infringes on states' rights to regulate healthcare.
- The broad definition of 'emergency health care' could be subject to interpretation and debate.
- May face strong opposition in the Senate or from the executive branch, limiting its impact.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution's alignment with the US Constitution is complex. Supporters might argue it aligns with the general welfare clause (Preamble) by promoting health and well-being. Opponents may argue that it infringes upon states' rights, as the Constitution grants states powers not explicitly delegated to the federal government. The resolution also touches on individual rights, but the Constitution does not explicitly mention abortion rights, leading to ongoing legal and political debate.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).