H.R.es27 - Expressing opposition to Central Business District Tolling Program of New York City. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.27 expresses the House of Representatives' opposition to New York City's Central Business District Tolling Program. The resolution highlights concerns about the program's potential economic burden on commuters, small businesses, and consumers. It also raises concerns about increased congestion in outer boroughs and questions the allocation of revenue generated by the program.
Expected Effects
If passed, this resolution would signal Congressional disapproval of the tolling program. While the resolution itself does not have the force of law, it could influence federal agencies and the State of New York to reconsider or halt the program's implementation. It may also lead to further investigation into the economic impacts of the tolling program.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially prevents financial strain on commuters and small businesses.
- Could lead to a more thorough economic impact assessment.
- May prevent increased congestion in outer boroughs.
- Could encourage exploration of alternative funding models for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
- Addresses concerns about the allocation of tolling revenue.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could hinder efforts to improve New York City's public transportation infrastructure.
- May delay or prevent the implementation of congestion reduction strategies.
- Could negatively impact the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's capital investment program.
- May perpetuate existing budget shortfalls within the MTA.
- Could be seen as federal overreach into state and local matters.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution primarily concerns economic policy and infrastructure within a specific state, areas traditionally under state and local control. While Congress has the power to influence state policies through funding and other mechanisms, this resolution is simply an expression of disapproval. There is no direct constitutional conflict, although some may argue about the appropriate balance between federal and state authority. The resolution does not appear to infringe upon any specific rights enumerated in the Constitution or its amendments.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).