H.R.es28 - Bringing Real Ideas, Data, and Genuine Experience to Congress Resolution; BRIDGE to Congress Resolution (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.28, also known as the BRIDGE to Congress Resolution, aims to eliminate the restriction that witnesses may only appear remotely at House committee proceedings at the discretion of the committee chair. The resolution amends Section 3(i)(1) of House Resolution 5, agreed to January 3, 2025, by removing the phrase "at the discretion of the chair of the committee and".
This change intends to broaden access to expert testimony and diverse perspectives in congressional hearings. The resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 9, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Rules.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this resolution would be to allow witnesses to appear remotely at committee proceedings without needing the explicit approval of the committee chair. This could lead to increased participation from individuals who may face logistical or financial barriers to in-person testimony.
It could also streamline the process for scheduling witnesses and potentially expedite committee work. The change may also shift some power away from committee chairs regarding witness selection and accessibility.
Potential Benefits
- Increased accessibility for witnesses: Experts and individuals from diverse geographic locations or with limited resources may find it easier to participate in committee hearings.
- Wider range of perspectives: Removing the chair's discretion could lead to a broader array of viewpoints being presented to Congress.
- Improved efficiency: Streamlining the process for remote testimony could expedite committee proceedings.
- Enhanced transparency: More open access to witness testimony could improve public understanding of legislative issues.
- Potential cost savings: Reduced travel expenses for witnesses and committee staff.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for technical difficulties: Remote testimony may be subject to technical glitches or disruptions.
- Reduced personal interaction: The lack of in-person interaction could hinder the ability of committee members to fully assess a witness's credibility.
- Security concerns: Remote testimony may raise concerns about witness identity verification and potential for outside interference.
- Uneven access to technology: Disparities in access to reliable internet and technology could disadvantage some potential witnesses.
- Possible decrease in the quality of testimony: Witnesses may not be as prepared or engaged when testifying remotely.
Constitutional Alignment
This resolution appears to align with the spirit of the First Amendment, which protects the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. By potentially broadening access to congressional hearings, the resolution could facilitate greater public participation in the legislative process.
Article I, Section 1 vests all legislative powers in Congress, and this resolution pertains to the internal rules and procedures of the House of Representatives, which falls within its purview. The Constitution grants each house of Congress the power to determine the rules of its proceedings.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).