H.R.es290 - Recognizing that the retirement of nonintermittent electric generation facilities, before facilities with equal or greater reliability attributes are available, is a threat to the reliability of the United States electric grid. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.290 is a resolution introduced in the House of Representatives that addresses concerns regarding the reliability of the United States electric grid. It specifically focuses on the retirement of nonintermittent electric generation facilities, such as coal and natural gas plants, before equally reliable replacements are available. The resolution highlights the potential threat this poses to grid stability, especially during peak demand and extreme weather conditions.
The resolution references reports from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) indicating potential electricity shortages in various regions. It also points to the increasing demand for electricity due to emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and overall energy demand growth.
The resolution supports President Trump's efforts to promote domestic energy production and reduce burdensome environmental regulations, aiming to ensure a reliable and affordable energy supply for the United States.
Expected Effects
If passed, this resolution would primarily serve as a statement of the House of Representatives' position on energy policy and grid reliability. It could influence future legislative actions and regulatory decisions related to energy production and environmental regulations.
It may lead to policies that favor the continued operation of nonintermittent power sources and potentially slow the transition to renewable energy sources. The resolution could also encourage investment in natural gas infrastructure to meet peak demand.
Ultimately, the effect will depend on how the executive branch and regulatory agencies interpret and implement the resolution's recommendations.
Potential Benefits
- Increased Grid Reliability: By preventing premature retirement of reliable power sources, the resolution aims to maintain a stable electricity supply, reducing the risk of blackouts and brownouts.
- Affordable Energy: The resolution emphasizes affordable energy, potentially benefiting consumers by keeping energy costs down.
- Economic Stability: A reliable and affordable energy supply can support economic growth and job creation by providing businesses with the power they need to operate.
- National Security: Ensuring a secure energy supply strengthens national security by reducing dependence on foreign energy sources and protecting critical infrastructure.
- Support for Domestic Energy Production: The resolution encourages the development of domestic energy resources, potentially creating jobs and boosting the economy.
Potential Disadvantages
- Environmental Concerns: Continued reliance on fossil fuels could exacerbate climate change and air pollution, negatively impacting public health and the environment.
- Slower Transition to Renewables: The resolution's focus on nonintermittent sources may slow the transition to cleaner, renewable energy sources.
- Potential for Increased Costs in the Long Run: Investing in aging infrastructure may be less cost-effective in the long run compared to investing in newer, more efficient technologies.
- Ignores Climate Change Mitigation: The resolution does not address climate change mitigation strategies, potentially leading to long-term environmental and economic risks.
- Disregard for Environmental Regulations: The resolution views environmental regulations as burdensome, potentially leading to weaker environmental protections.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution itself doesn't directly violate any specific clause of the US Constitution. Congress has the power to legislate on matters related to energy and commerce under Article I, Section 8 (the Commerce Clause). The resolution expresses the House's opinion on energy policy, which falls within its legislative purview.
However, the resolution's emphasis on domestic energy production and deregulation could potentially conflict with the government's responsibility to protect the environment and public health, as some argue these are implied responsibilities within the Constitution's preamble (promoting the general welfare).
Furthermore, the executive order mentioned, "Unleashing American Energy," could be subject to legal challenges if it infringes upon states' rights or exceeds the President's constitutional authority.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).