H.R.es354 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 60) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 78) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife…
Summary
H.Res. 354 is a resolution providing for the consideration of several joint resolutions (H.J. Res. 60, 78, 87, 88, and 89) in the House of Representatives. These joint resolutions aim to disapprove rules submitted by various federal agencies, including the National Park Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The resolutions address specific regulations related to motor vehicle usage in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, endangered species status for the Longfin Smelt, and California's vehicle emission standards.
Expected Effects
If adopted, H.Res. 354 will allow the House to debate and vote on the listed joint resolutions, potentially leading to the disapproval of the agency rules they target. This could result in the rollback of environmental regulations and changes to how federal lands are managed. The resolution also sets the terms of debate, limiting it to one hour and including one motion to recommit.
Potential Benefits
- Could lead to reduced regulatory burdens on businesses and individuals.
- May promote greater flexibility in the use of federal lands.
- Could potentially lower costs associated with compliance with environmental regulations.
- May support specific industries or economic activities that are affected by the targeted regulations.
- Could allow for re-evaluation of environmental regulations based on new data or changed circumstances.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could weaken environmental protections and harm endangered species.
- May lead to increased pollution and degradation of natural resources.
- Could undermine efforts to combat climate change.
- May create uncertainty for businesses and individuals who have invested in compliance with existing regulations.
- Could set a precedent for the frequent overturning of agency rules, leading to instability in regulatory policy.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution itself is procedurally aligned with the Constitution, as it pertains to the legislative process outlined in Article I, Section 7, regarding the passage of bills. The use of the Congressional Review Act (chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code) is a power delegated by Congress, and this resolution facilitates the exercise of that power. However, the constitutionality of the underlying joint resolutions (H.J. Res. 60, 78, 87, 88, and 89) would depend on whether they infringe upon any constitutional rights or exceed the scope of congressional authority.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).