H.R.es36 - Finding Federal Savings Committee Resolution (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.36, also known as the "Finding Federal Savings Committee Resolution," proposes amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to establish a new committee focused on eliminating nonessential federal programs. The committee would be responsible for researching, reviewing, and studying federal programs deemed underperforming or nonessential. It would then develop recommendations for the House to modify or eliminate these programs, submitting annual reports and legislation to that effect.
Expected Effects
The resolution aims to streamline government spending by identifying and eliminating wasteful or ineffective programs. This could lead to reduced government debt and a more efficient allocation of resources. The establishment of expedited procedures for legislation reported by the committee could accelerate the process of program modification or elimination.
Potential Benefits
- Potential reduction in government spending and debt.
- Increased efficiency in the allocation of federal resources.
- Enhanced oversight of federal programs.
- Streamlined process for eliminating wasteful programs.
- Could lead to tax savings for citizens.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for politically motivated targeting of programs.
- Risk of eliminating essential programs due to flawed assessments.
- Limited representation on the committee, potentially leading to biased recommendations.
- Expedited procedures could limit thorough debate and consideration of proposed changes.
- Job losses in the public sector if programs are eliminated.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the Constitution's emphasis on the legislative power of Congress (Article I, Section 1) and its authority to make rules for its proceedings. The creation of a committee to review and modify federal programs falls within Congress's implied powers to oversee the execution of laws and manage government resources. However, the specific programs targeted for elimination could raise constitutional concerns if they infringe upon individual rights or exceed the scope of federal power.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).