H.R.es386 - Condemning recent attacks on the free press by President Donald J. Trump and reaffirming the United States commitment to preserving and protecting freedom of the press as a cornerstone of democracy. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.386 is a resolution condemning President Donald J. Trump's attacks on the free press and reaffirming the United States' commitment to protecting freedom of the press as a cornerstone of democracy. The resolution cites specific instances of alleged attacks on the press, including accusations of 'illegal' behavior, exclusion from press pools, lawsuits against news organizations, and efforts to defund public broadcasting. It also highlights concerns about the treatment of USAGM journalists and the potential for these actions to embolden authoritarian regimes.
Expected Effects
If passed, this resolution would serve as a formal condemnation by the House of Representatives of President Trump's actions regarding the press. It would likely increase scrutiny of the executive branch's interactions with the media. The resolution could also influence future policy decisions related to press freedom and government transparency.
Potential Benefits
- Reaffirms the importance of a free press in a democracy.
- Sends a message of support to journalists facing threats and harassment.
- Could deter future actions that undermine press freedom.
- Promotes government accountability and transparency.
- Reinforces the United States' commitment to press freedom internationally.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could be seen as a partisan attack on the President.
- May further polarize the political climate.
- Could be interpreted as an attempt to interfere with the executive branch's authority.
- May not have any practical effect beyond symbolic condemnation.
- Could lead to retaliatory actions against news organizations.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution directly addresses the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech and of the press. The resolution argues that the President's actions potentially violate these constitutional protections. The resolution's call for respecting journalists' rights aligns with the spirit and letter of the First Amendment. However, the resolution itself does not create any new laws or regulations, and its impact on constitutional law is primarily symbolic.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).