H.R.es499 - Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4) to rescind certain budget authority proposed to be rescinded in special messages transmitted to the Congress by the President on June 3, 2025, in accordance with section 1012(a) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, and for other purposes. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.499 is a resolution providing for the consideration of H.R.4, a bill to rescind certain budget authority proposed by the President. The resolution waives points of order against the bill's consideration and its provisions, limits debate, and addresses impoundment control. It also adopts House Resolution 492.
Expected Effects
The resolution streamlines the process for considering H.R.4, potentially leading to a quicker vote on the proposed rescissions. This could result in altered budget authority depending on whether H.R.4 passes.
Potential Benefits
- Expedited consideration of a bill regarding budget authority.
- Allows for debate and a motion to recommit, ensuring some level of deliberation.
- Addresses specific concerns related to impoundment control.
- Provides clarity on the process by adopting another related House Resolution.
- Could lead to more efficient government spending if the rescissions are well-targeted.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Waiving points of order could bypass standard procedural safeguards.
- Limited debate time may restrict thorough examination of the bill's implications.
- Potential for rushed decisions regarding budget authority.
- Rescinding budget authority could negatively impact programs or initiatives.
- The impact depends heavily on the specific contents of H.R. 4, which are not detailed in this resolution.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution appears to align with the Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 7, which grants Congress the power to establish its rules of procedure. The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, referenced in the resolution, is an exercise of Congress's power of the purse. The Constitution grants Congress broad authority over federal spending. However, the specific impact on constitutional principles depends on the content of H.R. 4 and whether the rescissions infringe upon any constitutionally protected rights or functions.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).