H.R.es536 - Supporting the designation of the week including June 23, 2025, as National Women’s Sports Week to celebrate the anniversary of the passage of title IX and the growth of women’s sports. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.536 supports designating the week including June 23, 2025, as "National Women's Sports Week" to celebrate the anniversary of Title IX and the growth of women's sports. The resolution acknowledges Title IX's role in expanding athletic opportunities for women. It also expresses concerns about the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports.
The resolution highlights the perceived negative impacts of allowing transgender women to compete in women's sports, referencing fairness, safety, and biological differences. It advocates for single-sex teams and competitions based on biological sex.
The resolution ultimately aims to recognize the achievements of female athletes and promote equal access to athletic opportunities while also emphasizing the need to protect single-sex sports.
Expected Effects
If passed, this resolution would formally recognize National Women's Sports Week. This recognition could lead to increased awareness of Title IX and women's sports. It may also influence policy discussions regarding transgender athletes' participation in sports.
Potential Benefits
- Increased awareness of Title IX and its impact on women's sports.
- Recognition of the achievements of female athletes.
- Promotion of equal access to athletic opportunities for women.
- Potential support for legislative efforts to protect single-sex sports.
- Encourages programs and activities that celebrate female athletes and their supporters.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May alienate or exclude transgender athletes and their supporters.
- Could be perceived as discriminatory towards transgender individuals.
- May reinforce traditional gender roles and stereotypes.
- The focus on biological sex could lead to further marginalization of intersex athletes.
- The resolution's language and framing could contribute to a divisive political climate.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution's alignment with the US Constitution is complex. While it aims to promote equal opportunities, potentially aligning with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, its focus on single-sex sports based on biological sex raises questions about potential discrimination.
The resolution does not directly violate any specific constitutional provision. However, its implementation could face legal challenges based on equal protection and discrimination grounds.
The First Amendment protects freedom of association, which could be argued to support single-sex sports teams. However, this right is not absolute and must be balanced against other constitutional principles.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).