H.R.es66 - Affirming the role of the United States in improving access to quality, inclusive public education and improving learning outcomes for children and adolescents, particularly for girls, around the world. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.66 affirms the United States' role in improving access to quality, inclusive public education and learning outcomes for children and adolescents, particularly girls, worldwide. The resolution recognizes the International Day of Education and highlights the benefits of education for development, economic prosperity, and global security. It also acknowledges the work of USAID and partnerships like the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) and Education Cannot Wait (ECW).
Expected Effects
This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' commitment to global education. It encourages the U.S. government to continue prioritizing and funding international basic education programs. It also calls on the Secretary of State and the Administrator of USAID to use diplomatic, humanitarian, and development means to promote access to quality education globally, especially for marginalized groups.
Potential Benefits
- Improved Global Stability: By promoting education, the resolution aims to contribute to global stability and reduce conflict.
- Economic Prosperity: Increased access to education can lead to higher earnings and GDP growth.
- Poverty Reduction: Education is recognized as a key tool for poverty elimination.
- Support for Marginalized Groups: The resolution specifically emphasizes prioritizing education for children with disabilities, girls, and those in emergency settings.
- Strengthened International Cooperation: Supporting partnerships like GPE and ECW can leverage additional resources for global education.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential Financial Strain: Meeting the commitments to international basic education may require significant financial resources, potentially impacting domestic programs.
- Lack of Enforcement Mechanism: As a resolution, it does not have the force of law and relies on the executive branch's willingness to implement its recommendations.
- Dependency Concerns: Over-reliance on US aid could create dependency in recipient countries, hindering the development of sustainable local education systems.
- Focus on Quantity over Quality: Emphasis on access may overshadow the importance of ensuring the quality of education provided.
- Potential for Mismanagement: Funds allocated for international education programs could be subject to mismanagement or corruption, reducing their effectiveness.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the Constitution's broad goals of promoting the general welfare (Preamble). While the Constitution does not explicitly address international education, Congress's power to appropriate funds (Article I, Section 8) allows it to support such initiatives. The resolution does not infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).