H.R.es68 - Expressing strong disapproval of the President’s announcement to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.68 expresses the House of Representatives' strong disapproval of the President's announcement to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement. The resolution cites numerous reasons for disapproval, including the documented impacts of climate change, the importance of international cooperation, and the potential economic benefits of remaining in the agreement.
The resolution highlights the scientific consensus on climate change, referencing the Fifth National Climate Assessment and reports from the National Intelligence Council. It also emphasizes the economic opportunities associated with clean energy technologies and the potential for job creation through climate action.
Ultimately, the resolution urges the President to reverse the decision and calls on Congress to prioritize U.S. leadership in addressing climate change.
Expected Effects
If the President were to follow through with withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, the immediate effect would be largely symbolic, signaling a shift away from international climate cooperation. Longer term, it could lead to reduced investment in renewable energy and a weakening of U.S. influence in global climate negotiations.
Domestically, it could stall or reverse progress made in reducing emissions and developing clean energy infrastructure. Other nations might view the US as unreliable, impacting trade and diplomatic relations.
However, this resolution serves as a formal expression of disapproval from the House, potentially influencing public opinion and future policy decisions.
Potential Benefits
- Reinforces commitment to addressing climate change, potentially leading to further investments in renewable energy and green technologies.
- Maintains international cooperation on climate goals, enhancing the U.S.'s standing in global affairs.
- Supports job creation in the clean energy sector, fostering economic growth and innovation.
- Protects public health by mitigating the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events and air pollution.
- Encourages other nations to strengthen their climate commitments, contributing to a more sustainable future.
Potential Disadvantages
- The resolution itself has no legal binding and is purely symbolic, so it cannot prevent the President from withdrawing from the Paris Agreement.
- The resolution may deepen political divisions, making bipartisan cooperation on climate policy more difficult.
- It could be perceived as an overreach of congressional authority in foreign policy, potentially straining the relationship between the legislative and executive branches.
- The resolution's focus on climate action could divert attention and resources from other pressing national priorities.
- It may face resistance from those who prioritize economic growth over environmental concerns, leading to further policy gridlock.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the general welfare clause of the Constitution's preamble, which aims to "promote the general Welfare." However, the Constitution does not explicitly address international agreements or climate change. Congress's power to express disapproval is inherent in its legislative role and freedom of speech (Amendment I).
The resolution does not infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or provisions. The power to enter into and withdraw from international agreements is generally considered an executive power, but Congress has the power to influence policy through legislation and resolutions.
While the resolution itself does not violate the Constitution, the underlying issue of climate change and international agreements raises questions about the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches in foreign policy.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).