H.R.es71 - Condemning the Government of Mexico for failing to fulfill its water deliveries on an annual basis to the United States under the treaty between the United States and Mexico regarding the utilization of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.71 is a resolution introduced in the House of Representatives condemning the Government of Mexico for allegedly failing to meet its water delivery obligations to the United States under a treaty concerning the Colorado, Tijuana, and Rio Grande rivers. The resolution expresses the House's disapproval of Mexico's actions regarding water deliveries. It was submitted to the Committee on Foreign Affairs for consideration.
Expected Effects
If passed, the resolution would serve as a formal expression of disapproval by the House of Representatives towards Mexico's handling of water deliveries. This could strain diplomatic relations between the two countries and potentially lead to further actions by the US government to ensure treaty compliance. However, the resolution itself does not have the force of law.
Potential Benefits
- Could pressure Mexico to adhere to the water treaty, ensuring water access for US states.
- Demonstrates Congressional support for states and communities dependent on the water resources covered by the treaty.
- May lead to increased negotiations and dialogue to resolve the water delivery issues.
- Could set a precedent for holding other countries accountable for treaty obligations.
- Potentially strengthens the US position in future negotiations with Mexico on other issues.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could damage diplomatic relations with Mexico, leading to retaliatory measures or reduced cooperation on other issues (e.g., trade, immigration).
- May not be effective in compelling Mexico to change its water delivery practices if underlying issues (e.g., drought) persist.
- Could be perceived as an overreach of US authority and interference in Mexico's internal affairs.
- May lead to increased tensions and conflicts over shared water resources.
- The resolution itself has no legal binding and may be seen as purely symbolic.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution falls under the purview of Congress's authority to conduct foreign relations, as outlined in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and declare war. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention water treaties, the power to make treaties is vested in the President with the advice and consent of the Senate (Article II, Section 2). This resolution is an expression of the House's opinion on the execution of a treaty, which is within its implied powers to oversee the Executive Branch.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).