Preventing Woke Ai In The Federal Government
Summary
This executive order aims to prevent the use of "woke AI" in the federal government, specifically targeting large language models (LLMs). It establishes principles for unbiased AI, focusing on truth-seeking and ideological neutrality. The order directs agencies to procure LLMs that prioritize accuracy and avoid incorporating concepts related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) that the order defines as potentially distorting factual information.
Expected Effects
The order will likely change the criteria used for federal procurement of AI technologies. Agencies will need to ensure that LLMs comply with the principles of truth-seeking and ideological neutrality. This could lead to a shift in the types of AI models the government uses and the vendors it contracts with.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially ensures more accurate and reliable information from AI systems used by the government.
- May prevent the propagation of biased or ideologically driven content through government AI applications.
- Could foster greater public trust in government AI systems by emphasizing objectivity.
- May encourage innovation in AI development that focuses on accuracy and neutrality.
- Could reduce the risk of AI systems discriminating based on race or sex in their outputs.
Potential Disadvantages
- May limit the government's ability to address social inequities through AI technologies.
- Could be interpreted as an attempt to suppress certain viewpoints or perspectives.
- May stifle innovation in AI development by discouraging exploration of DEI-related applications.
- Could lead to legal challenges based on claims of discrimination or viewpoint discrimination.
- The definition of "woke AI" and "ideological neutrality" is subjective and may be difficult to enforce consistently.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The order's alignment with the Constitution is complex. While it aims to promote accuracy and objectivity, concerns arise under the First Amendment regarding freedom of speech and viewpoint discrimination. The government's ability to regulate AI content within its own procurement processes is generally accepted, but the specific restrictions on DEI-related concepts could be challenged as an infringement on protected expression. The order also invokes the President's authority under Article II to manage the executive branch and ensure faithful execution of the laws.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).