Restoring Gold Standard Science
Summary
This executive order, titled "Restoring Gold Standard Science," aims to ensure that federally funded research is transparent, rigorous, and impartial. It addresses concerns about the politicization of science and the use of misleading scientific information by federal agencies. The order mandates the implementation of "Gold Standard Science" principles across government agencies, emphasizing reproducibility, transparency, and unbiased peer review.
Expected Effects
The order will likely lead to changes in how federal agencies conduct and use scientific research. Agencies will be required to update their policies to align with the "Gold Standard Science" principles. This could result in a shift away from certain scientific findings or approaches favored by the previous administration.
Potential Benefits
- Increased transparency and reproducibility of federally funded research.
- Greater public trust in government decisions informed by science.
- More objective and unbiased scientific evaluations.
- Improved quality and reliability of scientific data used in policy-making.
- Reduced risk of scientific misconduct and data falsification.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential delays in policy implementation due to stricter scientific standards.
- Possible challenges in adapting existing research and data to the new standards.
- Risk of excluding diverse perspectives if the "Gold Standard Science" is narrowly defined.
- Increased administrative burden on agencies to comply with the new requirements.
- Potential for political interference in the definition and application of "Gold Standard Science."
Constitutional Alignment
The executive order is issued under the authority vested in the President by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 7301 of title 5, United States Code. While the Constitution does not explicitly address scientific standards, the order's emphasis on transparency and unbiased information aligns with the broader constitutional goals of promoting the general welfare and ensuring informed decision-making. The order does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).