Executive Orders by President Donald J. Trump

Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History

Summary

This executive order aims to restore what the President considers to be a truthful and uplifting portrayal of American history at federal sites, particularly the Smithsonian Institution and Independence National Historical Park. It directs the Vice President and other officials to remove "improper ideology" from these sites and ensure future appropriations align with the administration's vision of American values. The order also mandates a review of monuments and memorials under the Department of the Interior's jurisdiction to correct perceived historical inaccuracies or partisan content.

The order seeks to counteract what it describes as a revisionist movement that undermines American achievements by focusing on negative aspects of its history. It aims to promote a sense of national pride and unity by emphasizing the country's progress and ideals.

Ultimately, it directs federal agencies to prioritize a specific interpretation of American history in publicly funded institutions and spaces.

Expected Effects

The likely effect of this order is a shift in the presentation of history at federal museums and historical sites, emphasizing positive aspects of American history and downplaying or removing content that focuses on systemic inequalities or criticisms of American values. This could lead to changes in exhibits, educational programs, and the overall narrative presented to the public.

Funding for the Smithsonian Institution could be restricted based on adherence to the administration's preferred historical narrative. Monuments and memorials may be altered or reinstated to reflect this narrative.

This could lead to legal challenges based on academic freedom and freedom of speech.

Potential Benefits

  • Promotes a sense of national pride and unity by focusing on positive aspects of American history.
  • Could lead to increased funding for the maintenance and improvement of historical sites like Independence National Historical Park.
  • May encourage a more balanced presentation of American history by including achievements and progress alongside challenges.
  • Could foster a greater appreciation for American values and ideals.
  • Could lead to increased tourism at historical sites due to a more positive and uplifting atmosphere.

Potential Disadvantages

  • May suppress or distort important aspects of American history, particularly those related to social justice issues and the struggles of marginalized groups.
  • Could lead to censorship and the removal of valuable historical perspectives from museums and educational programs.
  • May create a biased and incomplete understanding of American history, hindering critical thinking and informed citizenship.
  • Could alienate certain segments of the population who feel their history and experiences are being ignored or misrepresented.
  • Could face legal challenges based on academic freedom and freedom of speech.

Constitutional Alignment

This order raises concerns regarding the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and expression. By directing federal agencies to promote a specific interpretation of American history and remove content deemed "improper ideology," the order could be seen as an attempt to control the narrative and suppress dissenting viewpoints. This could be viewed as government censorship, potentially violating the principles of academic freedom and the free exchange of ideas.

Furthermore, the order's focus on promoting a particular view of American values could be interpreted as an endorsement of certain beliefs over others, potentially infringing on the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from establishing a religion or favoring one religion over another. While not explicitly religious, the concept of "American values" can be closely tied to certain cultural or ideological beliefs.

While the order cites the President's authority under the Constitution, its implementation could face legal challenges based on these First Amendment concerns.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).