S.1112 - Big Bend National Park Boundary Adjustment Act (119th Congress)
Summary
S.1112, the Big Bend National Park Boundary Adjustment Act, proposes to adjust the boundary of Big Bend National Park in Texas. This adjustment involves the potential acquisition of approximately 6,100 acres of land or interests in land to be included within the park's boundary. The acquisition would occur through donation or exchange, explicitly prohibiting the use of eminent domain or condemnation.
Expected Effects
The bill aims to expand the park's boundaries, potentially enhancing conservation efforts and recreational opportunities. This expansion would be managed by the Secretary of the Interior through the National Park Service. The adjustment will be reflected in revised park boundaries and managed according to existing laws and regulations.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced Conservation: Expanding the park's boundary could protect additional natural resources and habitats.
- Increased Recreational Opportunities: More land within the park may lead to increased opportunities for hiking, camping, and other outdoor activities.
- Economic Benefits: Increased tourism due to an expanded park could benefit local economies.
- Preservation of Cultural Heritage: The acquired land may contain historical or cultural sites that would be preserved as part of the park.
- Improved Ecosystem Management: A larger park area allows for more comprehensive ecosystem management and conservation strategies.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential Landowner Concerns: Landowners within the affected area may have concerns about property values or land use restrictions.
- Administrative Costs: Managing a larger park area could increase administrative costs for the National Park Service.
- Limited Economic Impact: The economic benefits of increased tourism may be limited or unevenly distributed.
- Possible Conflicts: Conflicts may arise between different user groups, such as hikers, campers, and hunters, within the expanded park area.
- Acquisition Challenges: Acquiring land through donation or exchange may be challenging if landowners are unwilling to participate.
Constitutional Alignment
The proposed boundary adjustment appears to align with the Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to regulate federal lands. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights, such as those protected by the Bill of Rights. The prohibition of eminent domain in this act further protects individual property rights, aligning with the Fifth Amendment.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).