S.1239 - Convenient Contraception Act (119th Congress)
Summary
S.1239, the Convenient Contraception Act, aims to amend the Public Health Service Act, mandating that group health plans and health insurance issuers provide enrollees with the option to obtain a 365-day supply of contraceptives. This bill was introduced in the Senate on April 1, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. The Act stipulates that the Secretaries of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury must conduct outreach to inform healthcare providers and individuals about these new benefit requirements.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the Convenient Contraception Act would ensure that individuals have easier access to a year's supply of contraceptives through their health insurance plans. This could lead to improved contraceptive adherence and potentially reduce unintended pregnancies. The Act also requires outreach programs to educate people about the change.
Potential Benefits
- Increased convenience for individuals seeking contraception.
- Improved adherence to contraceptive regimens due to fewer refills.
- Potential reduction in unintended pregnancies.
- Reduced healthcare costs associated with unintended pregnancies.
- Enhanced access to reproductive healthcare.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential increased upfront costs for insurance plans, which may be passed on to consumers through premiums.
- Possible concerns from religious organizations or individuals who oppose contraception.
- Logistical challenges for pharmacies in stocking and dispensing large quantities of contraceptives.
- Risk of wastage if an individual changes their contraceptive method or insurance plan during the year.
- Potential for increased risk if certain contraceptives are not suitable for long-term use without regular medical supervision.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act appears to align with the general welfare clause of the Constitution, as it aims to improve public health by increasing access to contraception. However, potential challenges could arise under the First Amendment if religious organizations argue that the mandate infringes upon their religious freedom. The Act does not appear to violate any specific enumerated rights, but its constitutionality could be subject to judicial review based on religious freedom grounds.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).