S.1296 - Defending Education Transparency and Ending Rogue Regimes Engaging in Nefarious Transactions Act; DETERRENT Act (119th Congress)
Summary
The DETERRENT Act aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to enhance transparency regarding foreign gifts and contracts involving institutions of higher education. It seeks to prohibit contracts between these institutions and certain foreign entities or countries of concern. The bill mandates stricter disclosure requirements for foreign funding and establishes a waiver process for institutions seeking to engage with restricted foreign entities.
Expected Effects
The act will likely increase scrutiny of foreign funding sources for US colleges and universities. It could lead to a reduction in financial ties with countries and entities deemed to pose a national security risk. Institutions may face increased administrative burdens and potential penalties for non-compliance.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced transparency in foreign funding of higher education.
- Reduced influence of foreign entities of concern on academic research and curriculum.
- Improved national security by limiting access of foreign adversaries to sensitive research and technology.
- Greater accountability for institutions receiving foreign funds.
- Increased awareness among faculty and staff regarding potential conflicts of interest.
Potential Disadvantages
- Increased administrative burden and costs for institutions of higher education.
- Potential chilling effect on international collaborations and research partnerships.
- Possible loss of funding for certain academic programs and research projects.
- Risk of hindering academic freedom and open exchange of ideas.
- Potential for unintended consequences due to broad definitions of "foreign entity of concern."
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The act's focus on national security and regulating foreign influence aligns with the federal government's responsibility for national defense and foreign policy. However, potential impacts on academic freedom and freedom of association could raise First Amendment concerns. The balance between national security and individual liberties would need careful consideration to ensure constitutional compliance.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).