S.1749 - No United States Recognition of Russian Sovereignty Over Crimea or Any Other Forcibly Seized Ukrainian Territory (119th Congress)
Summary
S.1749, the "No United States Recognition of Russian Sovereignty Over Crimea or Any Other Forcibly Seized Ukrainian Territory Act," aims to codify the U.S. government's non-recognition policy regarding Russia's claims over Crimea and other Ukrainian territories seized by force. The bill prohibits federal departments and agencies from taking actions or spending funds that imply recognition of Russia's sovereignty over these territories, unless formally recognized by the democratically elected government of Ukraine.
The bill was introduced in the Senate on May 14, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. It reflects a bipartisan effort to support Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty.
This action reinforces existing U.S. foreign policy and sends a clear message of solidarity with Ukraine against Russian aggression.
Expected Effects
The bill's enactment would formalize the U.S. government's stance, preventing any potential ambiguity in its foreign policy towards Russia and Ukraine.
It would restrict federal agencies from actions that could be interpreted as legitimizing Russia's annexation of Crimea and other Ukrainian territories. This could impact diplomatic relations, economic sanctions, and international negotiations.
Ultimately, the bill aims to strengthen international pressure on Russia to respect Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Potential Benefits
- Reinforces U.S. commitment to international law and the principle of territorial integrity.
- Sends a strong signal of support to Ukraine, bolstering its morale and international standing.
- Clarifies U.S. policy, reducing the risk of misinterpretation by other nations.
- Potentially strengthens existing sanctions regimes against Russia.
- May encourage other countries to adopt similar non-recognition policies.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could potentially strain diplomatic relations with Russia, hindering cooperation on other global issues.
- May have limited practical impact if existing policies already reflect non-recognition.
- Could be perceived as escalatory by some, increasing tensions in the region.
- May not be effective in altering Russia's behavior in the short term.
- Could create a precedent for non-recognition policies in other territorial disputes, with potentially unforeseen consequences.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the U.S. Constitution's principles related to foreign policy and the powers of Congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations (Article I, Section 8). It also reflects the President's role in conducting foreign affairs, as the bill seeks to codify existing executive branch policy.
Furthermore, the bill indirectly supports the general welfare (Preamble) by promoting international stability and upholding international law. The bill does not infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or liberties.
While the Constitution does not explicitly address territorial disputes, the bill's focus on non-recognition is a legitimate exercise of congressional power in shaping foreign policy.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).