S.186 - No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
S.186, the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025," aims to prohibit the use of federal funds for abortions and for health benefit plans that cover abortions. The bill amends Title 1 of the United States Code and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, particularly concerning the Affordable Care Act (ACA). It clarifies that premium credits and cost-sharing reductions under the ACA cannot be used for health plans covering abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the mother's life.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of this bill, if enacted, would be to restrict access to abortion services for individuals who rely on federal funding for healthcare. It would also require clearer disclosure of abortion coverage in health plans and any associated surcharges. This could lead to changes in health insurance plan offerings and individual healthcare choices.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces the financial burden on taxpayers who oppose abortion.
- Increases transparency regarding abortion coverage in health insurance plans.
- Reinforces the principle that federal funds should not be used for activities that some taxpayers find morally objectionable.
- May encourage the development of separate insurance coverage options for abortion services.
- Could lead to greater awareness and discussion about the ethical and moral implications of abortion funding.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Restricts access to abortion services, particularly for low-income individuals who rely on federal subsidies for healthcare.
- May disproportionately affect women, especially those in marginalized communities.
- Could lead to increased unintended pregnancies if access to abortion is limited.
- May create administrative complexities and costs associated with separating abortion coverage from other healthcare services.
- Raises concerns about government interference in personal healthcare decisions.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutionality is subject to debate, particularly concerning the right to privacy and equal protection under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Opponents may argue that restricting access to abortion infringes upon these rights, as established in Roe v. Wade and subsequent cases, though Roe has been overturned. Supporters may argue that the bill aligns with the government's power to allocate funds and protect the rights of conscience. The bill also touches on the First Amendment's protection of religious freedom, as some taxpayers may object to funding abortions on religious grounds.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).