S.1926 - Reducing Waste in National Parks Act (119th Congress)
Summary
The "Reducing Waste in National Parks Act" aims to decrease disposable plastic product usage within National Park System units. It mandates the establishment of a program for reducing and potentially eliminating the sale and distribution of these products. The bill requires regional directors to implement plans, considering factors like operational costs, waste reduction, and visitor education.
Expected Effects
This act will likely lead to a reduction in plastic waste within national parks. It may also increase the availability of reusable containers and water refill stations. However, it could also impact concessioner revenue and visitor convenience.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced plastic waste in national parks, contributing to environmental protection.
- Increased availability of water refill stations, promoting reusable containers.
- Enhanced visitor education regarding waste reduction and water availability.
- Potential for cost savings in waste management over the long term.
- Improved aesthetics and preservation of natural landscapes within the parks.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential negative impact on concessioner revenue due to reduced sales of bottled water and other plastic products.
- Increased operational costs for bottle refill stations (utilities, testing).
- Possible inconvenience for visitors who are unprepared with reusable water bottles.
- Contractual implications with concessioners, potentially leading to disputes or renegotiations.
- Public safety concerns if visitors resort to drinking from unsafe water sources due to lack of readily available water.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the general welfare clause of the Constitution, as it aims to protect the environment and promote public health within national parks. Congress has the power to regulate federal lands under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, which grants Congress the power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States. The Act does not appear to infringe on any specific individual rights or liberties protected by the Constitution or its amendments.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).