S.1981 - Strategic Grazing to Reduce Risk of Wildfire Act (119th Congress)
Summary
The Strategic Grazing to Reduce Risk of Wildfire Act (S.1981) aims to require the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to utilize livestock grazing as a tool for wildfire risk reduction on federal lands. This involves developing a strategy within 18 months of enactment, in coordination with grazing permit holders and other stakeholders. The strategy will consider various aspects of grazing, including its use during droughts, in wildland-urban interfaces, and for controlling invasive species.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would lead to increased use of livestock grazing as a wildfire management tool on National Forest System lands and public lands. This could change land management practices and potentially impact ecosystems and other land uses. The bill also emphasizes collaboration with local communities and stakeholders in developing and implementing grazing strategies.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced wildfire risk through targeted grazing.
- Potential for economic benefits for livestock operators.
- Improved management of invasive species like cheatgrass.
- Collaboration between federal agencies, states, and local communities.
- Potential for healthier ecosystems through managed grazing.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for overgrazing and damage to sensitive ecosystems.
- Conflicts with other land uses, such as recreation and wildlife habitat.
- Administrative burden of developing and implementing grazing strategies.
- Potential for increased costs associated with managing grazing programs.
- Possible negative impacts on native plant species.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the General Welfare Clause (Preamble) by aiming to reduce wildfire risk and protect communities. Congress has the power to legislate regarding federal lands under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, which grants Congress the power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).