S.2005 - IDeA Reauthorization Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
S.2005, the IDeA Reauthorization Act of 2025, aims to improve the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) program at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The bill focuses on enhancing biomedical research in states that receive less NIH funding. It mandates increased transparency and reporting to Congress regarding the program's strategy, awards, and achievements.
Expected Effects
The bill will likely lead to increased funding and resources for biomedical research institutions in IDeA states. This could result in improved research capabilities, increased scientific output, and better integration of these states into national research initiatives. The enhanced reporting requirements will also provide greater accountability for the NIH regarding the IDeA program.
Potential Benefits
- Increased research funding for institutions in underfunded states.
- Improved integration of IDeA states into national research initiatives.
- Enhanced transparency and accountability of the IDeA program through mandated reporting to Congress.
- Potential for gains in academic research quality and biomedical science human resource development in IDeA states.
- Encourages partnerships between institutions in IDeA and non-IDeA states.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased bureaucracy due to new reporting requirements.
- Possible diversion of resources from other NIH programs to fund the expanded IDeA program.
- Risk that the focus on geographic distribution of funding may overshadow merit-based allocation.
- The definition of 'IDeA State' based on a rolling multi-year average could lead to instability in funding eligibility.
- Potential for increased lobbying efforts by states to remain or become classified as IDeA states.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution's general welfare clause (Preamble). Congress has the power to appropriate funds for programs that promote scientific research and development, which can be considered part of the general welfare. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).