S.573 - To designate a mountain in the State of Alaska as Denali. (119th Congress)
Summary
This Senate bill, S. 573, aims to officially designate a mountain in Alaska as "Denali." The bill was introduced in the Senate on February 13, 2025, by Senators Murkowski and Sullivan and was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. The bill seeks to change all references in law, maps, regulations, and other official documents to reflect this new designation.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would change the official name of the mountain located at the specified coordinates in Alaska to "Denali." This would require updates to all relevant federal records and maps. It primarily has a symbolic and cultural impact.
Potential Benefits
- Acknowledges and respects the indigenous name for the mountain, honoring Alaskan Native culture.
- May promote tourism to the Denali National Park and Preserve.
- Could foster a greater sense of cultural pride and recognition for the state of Alaska.
- Clarifies the official name, reducing potential confusion in legal and governmental contexts.
- Reinforces the importance of place names in reflecting history and heritage.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May be perceived as a symbolic gesture without significant practical impact on the lives of most Americans.
- Could potentially upset individuals who are accustomed to the mountain's previous designation.
- The cost of updating maps and official documents, although likely minimal, could be seen as an unnecessary expenditure.
- May open the door for further requests for place name changes, potentially leading to debates over historical accuracy and cultural sensitivity.
- Some may view this as a distraction from more pressing legislative matters.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the legislative powers granted to Congress under Article I, Section 8, which includes the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof. While not explicitly mentioned, the designation of place names falls within the implied powers necessary for governance. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).