S.669 - Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle Act of 2025; DEFUND Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
S.669, the "Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle Act of 2025" or "DEFUND Act of 2025," proposes the complete withdrawal of the United States from the United Nations and all its affiliated organizations. This includes repealing the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and the United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act. The bill also prohibits any further financial contributions to the UN, ends participation in UN peacekeeping operations, and revokes diplomatic immunity for UN personnel within the United States.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the US would cease to be a member of the UN, significantly altering its foreign policy and international relations. The US would no longer be bound by UN treaties or resolutions. The UN's presence and activities within the US would be curtailed, and the US would lose its influence within the UN system.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces financial burden on US taxpayers by eliminating contributions to the UN.
- May allow the US to pursue foreign policy objectives without the constraints of international consensus.
- Could strengthen US sovereignty by removing the influence of international bodies.
- Might lead to a realignment of US foreign policy priorities.
- Could free up resources for domestic programs.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could harm US international standing and diplomatic relations.
- May reduce US influence in global affairs and conflict resolution.
- Could negatively impact efforts to address global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and poverty.
- Might weaken international cooperation on security issues.
- Could isolate the US from key international partners.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's proponents might argue that it aligns with the principle of national sovereignty, suggesting that the US should not be bound by international organizations. They may cite Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, implying control over international agreements. However, opponents could argue that withdrawing from international agreements undermines the treaty power outlined in Article II, Section 2, which gives the President the power to make treaties with the advice and consent of the Senate. The bill's impact on international relations could also be debated in light of the President's role in foreign policy.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).