S.771 - End FEMA Benefits for Illegal Immigrants Act (119th Congress)
Summary
S.771, the "End FEMA Benefits for Illegal Immigrants Act," aims to terminate the Shelter and Services Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The bill prohibits FEMA from supporting sheltering and related activities for relieving overcrowding in short-term holding facilities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection. It also rescinds unobligated balances from specific appropriations acts related to these activities.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of this bill is a reduction in federal support for sheltering and services provided to individuals, particularly those who have crossed the border illegally. This could lead to increased strain on state and local resources, as well as non-governmental organizations, to provide these services. The bill also redirects funds previously allocated for these purposes.
Potential Benefits
- Potential cost savings for federal taxpayers by eliminating the FEMA program.
- May discourage illegal immigration by reducing perceived benefits.
- Could incentivize more stringent border control measures.
- Reallocation of resources to other national priorities.
- Addresses concerns about the use of federal funds for undocumented immigrants.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential strain on state and local resources to provide shelter and services.
- Possible humanitarian concerns related to the treatment of asylum seekers and undocumented immigrants.
- Increased overcrowding in existing facilities.
- Potential for negative impact on public health due to inadequate shelter and sanitation.
- May face legal challenges based on humanitarian grounds.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment is complex. Congress has the power to control federal spending under Article I, Section 8, which grants the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. The bill could be argued as an exercise of this power to direct federal funds. However, arguments could be made that the bill infringes on the principles of equal protection and due process, particularly if it leads to inhumane treatment of individuals seeking asylum, although these protections primarily apply to citizens.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).