S.78 - Taxpayer Resources Used in Emergencies Accountability Act; TRUE Accountability Act (119th Congress)
Summary
S.78, the Taxpayer Resources Used in Emergencies Accountability Act or TRUE Accountability Act, aims to improve internal controls within federal agencies during emergencies. It mandates that covered agencies develop and regularly update plans for internal control, focusing on preventing improper payments and fraud related to disaster relief and public health emergencies. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is tasked with issuing guidance and reviewing agency plans.
Expected Effects
This bill will likely lead to enhanced oversight and accountability in the distribution of emergency funds. It requires agencies to proactively identify and mitigate risks of fraud and improper payments. The bill also emphasizes timely risk assessment and implementation of appropriate controls before funds are spent.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced Waste and Fraud: Enhanced internal controls can minimize improper payments and fraudulent activities during emergencies.
- Improved Efficiency: Agencies will be better prepared to manage and distribute resources effectively.
- Increased Accountability: Clear lines of responsibility are established for the implementation of internal control plans.
- Better Risk Management: Proactive risk assessments will help agencies anticipate and address potential issues.
- Enhanced Public Trust: Greater transparency and accountability can improve public confidence in government's handling of emergencies.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Administrative Burden: Developing and updating internal control plans may create additional work for agencies.
- Potential for Bureaucracy: The required processes could slow down the distribution of emergency funds.
- Limited Scope: The bill focuses primarily on financial controls and may not address other critical aspects of emergency response.
- No Additional Funding: The bill explicitly states that no additional funds are authorized, potentially straining existing resources.
- Lack of Judicial Review: Decisions made under this act are not subject to judicial review, which could limit accountability.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution's emphasis on government efficiency and accountability. Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 states that "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time." This bill supports the intent of this clause by promoting responsible spending of taxpayer money, especially during emergencies. The lack of judicial review may raise concerns about due process, although Congress has broad authority to set the terms of judicial review for statutory schemes.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).