S.795 - Farmers Freedom Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
The Farmers Freedom Act of 2025 aims to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act by excluding 'prior converted cropland' from the definition of 'navigable waters'. This exclusion would limit the regulatory authority of the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers over these lands. The bill defines 'prior converted cropland' and specifies conditions for its exclusion, including provisions related to abandoned land and agricultural purposes.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this act would be to reduce federal oversight of certain agricultural lands concerning water pollution. This could lead to increased agricultural activity on these lands without the need for federal permits related to water quality. It may also affect wetland conservation efforts.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced regulatory burden on farmers, potentially lowering costs and increasing agricultural output.
- Clarification of the definition of 'navigable waters' to provide more certainty for landowners.
- Encouragement of agricultural activities on prior converted cropland, supporting rural economies.
- Potential for increased flexibility in land use for agricultural purposes, including conservation practices.
- Protection for farmers from potential penalties related to water pollution on prior converted cropland.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased pollution of waterways due to reduced regulation of agricultural runoff.
- Loss of wetland habitats and associated ecological benefits.
- Reduced ability of the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers to protect water quality.
- Possible negative impacts on downstream water users and ecosystems.
- Could undermine the overall goals of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutional alignment hinges on the interpretation of the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8), which grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, including navigable waters. The extent to which the definition of 'navigable waters' can be narrowed without infringing on federal authority over interstate commerce is a key consideration. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific individual rights outlined in the Bill of Rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).