S.854 - Risky Research Review Act (119th Congress)
Summary
The Risky Research Review Act aims to establish a Life Sciences Research Security Board to oversee and regulate federally funded life sciences research, particularly focusing on 'dual use research of concern' and 'gain of function research.' The board will review proposed research projects, assess their potential risks and benefits, and make binding determinations on whether agencies can award federal funding. The act defines key terms like 'high-consequence pathogen' and 'high-risk life sciences research' to provide a framework for the board's evaluations.
Expected Effects
The act will likely increase scrutiny and regulation of life sciences research, potentially slowing down the pace of some research projects. It could also lead to increased transparency and accountability in the funding and conduct of research with potential biosecurity risks. The creation of the Life Sciences Research Security Board will add a new layer of bureaucracy to the research funding process.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced biosecurity by preventing misuse of research findings.
- Increased transparency in federally funded life sciences research.
- Independent assessment of risks associated with high-risk research.
- Establishment of clear definitions and guidelines for dual-use research.
- Potential for improved public trust in the safety and ethical oversight of scientific research.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential delays in research funding due to the additional review process.
- Increased administrative burden for researchers and funding agencies.
- Possible stifling of innovation due to overly cautious risk assessments.
- Risk of political influence on the board's decisions.
- Potential for conflicts of interest among board members.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The act's constitutionality is primarily grounded in Congress's power to provide for the common defense and general welfare (Article I, Section 8). The establishment of a board to regulate research with potential national security implications aligns with this power. However, the act's potential impact on academic freedom and scientific inquiry could raise concerns under the First Amendment, particularly if the board's regulations are overly broad or restrictive.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).