S.93 - Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Amendments Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
S.93, the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Amendments Act of 2025, aims to amend the 1998 Act to better address harmful algal blooms and hypoxia. The bill emphasizes research, monitoring, and control of these blooms in marine, estuarine, and freshwater systems. It also seeks to improve coordination among federal agencies and with state, tribal, and local entities.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of this bill is enhanced research and monitoring capabilities related to harmful algal blooms and hypoxia. This includes improved forecasting, data management, and information dissemination. Furthermore, the bill could lead to better strategies for preventing, controlling, and mitigating the impacts of these environmental hazards on ecosystems, public health, and economies.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced monitoring and forecasting of harmful algal blooms and hypoxia.
- Improved coordination among federal, state, tribal, and local agencies.
- Increased research into the causes, consequences, and mitigation strategies for these events.
- Support for innovative technologies and measures to control harmful algal blooms.
- Protection of key habitats, public health, and coastal resources.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased government spending, although the bill emphasizes cost-effective methods.
- Possible regulatory burdens on industries such as agriculture and fisheries.
- The effectiveness of the measures depends on the actual implementation and funding levels.
- There might be challenges in coordinating efforts across different agencies and levels of government.
- The bill's success relies on accurate scientific assessments and effective action strategies.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the Constitution's mandate to "promote the general Welfare" (Preamble) by addressing environmental and public health concerns related to harmful algal blooms and hypoxia. Congress's authority to regulate interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8) could be invoked to justify federal involvement in addressing these issues, particularly when they affect navigable waters and fisheries that cross state lines. The bill also respects the role of states and tribes by requiring consultation with them.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).