S.jres26 - Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to Israel of certain defense articles and services. (119th Congress)
Summary
This document is a joint resolution introduced in the Senate aiming to disapprove a proposed foreign military sale to Israel. The resolution specifically targets the sale of certain defense articles and services, including GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bombs, MK 82 bomb bodies, and JDAM guidance kits, as detailed in Transmittal No. 24-13. The resolution cites the Arms Export Control Act as the legal basis for congressional disapproval.
The resolution seeks to block the transfer of these specific munitions and related support services to Israel. It was introduced by Mr. Sanders and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations for consideration.
Passage of this resolution would prevent the sale from proceeding unless overridden, reflecting a congressional check on executive power in foreign military sales.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this resolution would prevent the specified foreign military sale to Israel from proceeding. This could strain diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Israel, at least temporarily.
The immediate effect would be to halt the transfer of the listed defense articles and services. Longer term, it could lead to a reassessment of U.S. arms sales policies and congressional oversight of such sales.
Israel would need to seek alternative sources for these weapons or adjust its military strategy.
Potential Benefits
- Could reduce the risk of civilian casualties in conflict zones where these weapons might be used.
- May encourage Israel to pursue diplomatic solutions rather than military actions.
- Could strengthen congressional oversight of foreign military sales, ensuring greater accountability.
- Might align U.S. foreign policy more closely with international human rights standards.
- Could potentially de-escalate regional conflicts by limiting the flow of arms.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could damage the strategic alliance between the U.S. and Israel.
- May weaken Israel's ability to defend itself against perceived threats.
- Could incentivize Israel to seek military support from other less reliable or aligned nations.
- Might be perceived as a sign of wavering U.S. commitment to its allies, undermining U.S. influence.
- Could embolden actors hostile to both the U.S. and Israel.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the constitutional principle of checks and balances, specifically Congress's role in foreign policy. Article I, Section 8 grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to declare war, implying a role in overseeing foreign military engagements.
The Arms Export Control Act, cited in the resolution, provides a statutory basis for congressional review of arms sales. This act itself is an exercise of Congress's constitutional powers.
However, the President also has significant authority in foreign affairs, potentially leading to a conflict between the executive and legislative branches. The resolution does not violate any specific constitutional provision but tests the balance of power.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).