S.jres30 - Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area; Motor Vehicles. (119th Congress)
Summary
This document is a joint resolution (S.J. Res. 30) introduced in the Senate during the 119th Congress. It aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the National Park Service (NPS) concerning motor vehicle usage within the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. The resolution cites chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, as the basis for congressional disapproval, referencing a specific rule published in the Federal Register (90 Fed. Reg. 2621).
Expected Effects
If enacted, this resolution would nullify the NPS rule regarding motor vehicles in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. This would mean the regulations outlined in 90 Fed. Reg. 2621 would have no legal effect. The management of motor vehicle usage in the recreation area would likely revert to previous regulations or require the NPS to develop a revised rule.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially allows for greater access for individuals who rely on motor vehicles to access the recreation area.
- Could reduce perceived overreach by the National Park Service in regulating recreational activities.
- May address concerns from local communities or stakeholders who believe the rule negatively impacts tourism or access.
- Reinforces congressional oversight of executive agency rulemaking, ensuring accountability.
- Could lead to a more balanced approach to recreation and environmental protection in the Glen Canyon area.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could lead to increased environmental damage within the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area due to unregulated motor vehicle use.
- May negatively impact the visitor experience for those who prefer a more natural and less disturbed environment.
- Could undermine the authority and expertise of the National Park Service in managing national recreation areas.
- May create uncertainty for visitors and local businesses regarding motor vehicle regulations.
- Could set a precedent for congressional interference in routine agency rulemaking, potentially disrupting park management.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
This resolution appears to align with the principle of congressional oversight of executive branch agencies. Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution vests all legislative powers in Congress. Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, provides a mechanism for Congress to review and disapprove agency rules, which is an exercise of this legislative power. The resolution does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or protections.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).