S.jres33 - Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services. (119th Congress)
Summary
Senate Joint Resolution 33 proposes congressional disapproval of a foreign military sale to the Government of Israel. The resolution specifically targets the sale of certain defense articles and services, including MK 84 or BLU-117 bomb bodies and I-2000 Penetrator warheads. The resolution cites Transmittal No. 25-34, submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this resolution would prohibit the specified foreign military sale to Israel. This could strain diplomatic relations and impact Israel's defense capabilities. It could also signal a shift in US foreign policy regarding arms sales.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces the risk of civilian casualties in conflict zones.
- May encourage Israel to pursue diplomatic solutions rather than military action.
- Could improve the United States' international standing by signaling a commitment to human rights.
- Reasserts Congressional authority over foreign policy decisions.
- Aligns with a more cautious approach to arms exports.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could weaken Israel's ability to defend itself.
- May damage the strategic alliance between the United States and Israel.
- Could embolden adversaries of Israel.
- May be perceived as an abandonment of a key ally.
- Could negatively impact the US defense industry if similar sales are blocked in the future.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to declare war. Additionally, the Arms Export Control Act, cited in the resolution, provides a statutory framework for congressional oversight of arms sales, suggesting a constitutional basis for congressional action in this area.
However, the President also has significant authority in foreign policy. This resolution represents a check on that power by the legislative branch.
The resolution itself does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or freedoms.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).