S.Res.113 - Reaffirming the fundamental principle prohibiting any state from forcibly acquiring the territory of another state. (119th Congress)
Summary
Senate Resolution 113 reaffirms the principle that no state should forcibly acquire territory from another. It references the Russian Federation's invasion and occupation of Ukraine as a violation of this principle. The resolution also quotes President Reagan's stance on defending democratic allies against aggression.
Expected Effects
The resolution serves as a formal expression of the Senate's stance against the forceful acquisition of territory. It reinforces existing international norms and signals US support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other nations. The resolution may influence diplomatic efforts and international relations.
Potential Benefits
- Reinforces international law and norms.
- Supports the sovereignty and territorial integrity of nations.
- Sends a clear message against aggression.
- Potentially strengthens diplomatic efforts.
- Aligns with historical US foreign policy principles.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Has no direct legal impact as it is a resolution, not a law.
- May be seen as symbolic if not followed by concrete action.
- Could strain relations with countries engaged in territorial disputes.
- Potential for selective application, undermining credibility.
- May divert attention from domestic issues.
Constitutional Alignment
While the Constitution does not explicitly address the forceful acquisition of territory by other nations, this resolution aligns with the general principles of national security and foreign policy implicitly granted to the federal government. Article I, Section 8 provides Congress with the power to declare war, raise and support armies, and provide for the common defense, suggesting an implicit role in shaping foreign policy to protect national interests and international stability. The resolution also indirectly supports the principle of upholding international law, which can be seen as contributing to a more stable global environment conducive to US interests.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).