S.Res.126 - Calling on the United Nations Security Council to enforce the existing arms embargo on Darfur and extend it to cover all of Sudan. (119th Congress)
Summary
Senate Resolution 126 addresses the ongoing conflict in Sudan, particularly focusing on the Darfur region. It calls upon the United Nations Security Council to enforce the existing arms embargo on Darfur and extend it to cover all of Sudan, including dual-use equipment. The resolution also urges the establishment of a more stringent sanctions enforcement regime and mechanisms for humanitarian aid delivery and civilian protection.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this resolution would likely increase international pressure on Sudan's warring parties to cease hostilities. It could also lead to stricter enforcement of arms embargoes, potentially limiting the flow of weapons into the region. Furthermore, it could facilitate increased humanitarian aid and protection for civilians affected by the conflict.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces the flow of arms to warring parties, decreasing violence.
- Increases pressure on the Sudanese government and rebel forces to negotiate peace.
- May improve the delivery of humanitarian aid to affected populations.
- Could strengthen international cooperation in addressing the Sudanese conflict.
- Aligns with U.S. foreign policy goals of promoting human rights and stability.
Potential Disadvantages
- May strain relations with countries that supply arms to Sudan.
- Enforcement of the embargo could be challenging and costly.
- The resolution's success depends on the willingness of the UN Security Council to act.
- May not be effective if warring parties find alternative sources of weapons.
- Could have unintended consequences for regional stability.
Constitutional Alignment
While the resolution itself doesn't directly implicate the US Constitution, its implementation could raise questions regarding the separation of powers. Specifically, the resolution calls on the US government to take certain actions, which could potentially infringe upon the President's authority to conduct foreign policy (Article II). However, Congress has broad authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations (Article I, Section 8), which could be used to justify actions taken to enforce the arms embargo. The resolution also aligns with the general welfare clause of the Constitution, as it aims to alleviate human suffering and promote stability.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).