S.Res.72 - Affirming that Hamas cannot retain any political or military control in the Gaza Strip . (119th Congress)
Summary
Senate Resolution 72 affirms that Hamas should not retain political or military control in the Gaza Strip. It calls for the President to use economic and diplomatic tools to halt funding to Hamas, particularly from Iran. The resolution also expresses support for Israel's defense against attacks from Hamas and Iranian proxies.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this resolution would likely lead to increased pressure on Hamas and its sources of funding. It could also strengthen the US-Israel alliance. The practical effect depends on the actions taken by the President in response to the resolution's call.
Potential Benefits
- Strengthened national security through reduced terrorist threats.
- Reinforced alliance with Israel, a key strategic partner.
- Potential for greater stability in the Middle East if Hamas's power is diminished.
- Reduced financial support for terrorist activities.
- Upholding international norms against terrorism.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased tensions in the Middle East.
- Risk of alienating some international actors.
- Possible unintended consequences from economic sanctions.
- May not fully eliminate Hamas's influence.
- Could be perceived as taking sides in a complex conflict.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the President's constitutional powers related to foreign policy and national security. Specifically, the President has the power to conduct foreign affairs and to act as Commander-in-Chief. Congress has the power to declare war and regulate commerce with foreign nations (Article I, Section 8). The resolution itself does not enact any law, but expresses the sense of the Senate, which is within its purview.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).